福利姬自慰

Have the Oscars encouraged more diverse hiring practices in film? A 福利姬自慰researcher breaks down the data

Actors Riz Ahmed, left, and Allison Williams announce the nominations for the 2023 Academy Awards
Actors Riz Ahmed, left, and Allison Williams announce the nominations for the 2023 Academy Awards, which will be presented on March 12 (photo by Jay L. Clendenin/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

Outrage gripped the Academy Awards in 2015 when, for the second year in a row, only white actors were nominated in the best acting categories. The #OscarsSoWhite hashtag quickly took over social media as the public and celebrities alike demanded change.

In response, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences 鈥 the voting body that determines the Oscar nominees and winners 鈥 committed to diversifying itself. Six years later, six actors 鈥 or roughly 30 per cent of the  in 2023 鈥 identify as part of a racial minority.

鈥淚 think this is a very positive signal,鈥 says Daphne Baldassari, a Ph.D candidate in strategic management in the University of Toronto's  and a research fellow at the .

She notes that in recent years, many industries have reckoned with racial discrimination and made efforts to diversify their workforces. But few have dealt with the issue as publicly as the film and television sector.

Following the 2015 backlash, the academy added 683 new members to its 5,700-plus voting body, 46 per cent of whom were women and 41 per cent of whom were from underrepresented racial groups. (The academy was previously 94 per cent white and 77 per cent male, .)

The impact of this diversification goes beyond a more diverse nominee group, according to a chapter of , 鈥淥scars So White? Hiring Effects of an Evaluator鈥檚 Diversity Intervention.鈥

Many film companies seek the reputational bump from the academy, and after its membership changed to be more inclusive, studios looking to score an Oscar were more likely adjust their hiring practices to ensure more diverse representation, Baldassari found.


The 2022 hit film Everything Everywhere All at Once is nominated in 11 categories at this year's Oscars, including Best Picture (photo courtesy of A24 Films)

 

Working with 鈥 the global entertainment data company formerly known as MRC Data and Nielsen Music 鈥 Baldassari analyzed the hiring data of 6,999 feature-length films released in the U.S. between 2010 and 2021. Overall, she examined more than 193,000 staffing choices in the industry.

She approached the research with three hypotheses. First, Baldassari posited that following the decision to create a more diverse judging committee for the Oscars, award-seeking companies would be more likely to do the same. Second, she believed that the positive hiring effect would be most prominent in visible roles 鈥 the top-billed or above-the-line positions such as producers, actors and directors. (These are in comparison to 鈥渂elow-the-line鈥 roles, such cinematographers and costume designers.) And third, she surmised that people already affiliated with an award body 鈥 such as existing members and nominees 鈥 were most likely to see the benefits than those who were not.

Overall, her theories proved accurate. Following the academy's 2016 diversification efforts, there was an increase in racial diversity of the makeup of film crews 鈥 with some caveats. Across the board, women and racial minorities were about five per cent more likely to be hired to work on a film.  

However, those in above-the-line roles saw their chance of getting hired increase by 3.3 percentage points, while those in below-the-line positions saw no statistical change to their chances of being hired.

鈥淐hange here is not necessarily driven by an intrinsic motivation of driving diversity,鈥 Baldassari says. 鈥淎ward-seeking films seek to appeal to the academy, so positive hiring effects stay in the most visible occupations.鈥

Women and racial minorities who had previously worked on award-seeking films saw a 1.6 per cent increase in the chance that they鈥檇 be re-hired, while those who had not worked on an award-seeking film saw no change.

Regardless of how small the changes were, they made a difference to what audiences see on screen and which movies get recognition.

鈥淩ecently we鈥檝e been seeing new depictions of lots of people on screen, such as Asian Americans with movies like Minari and Everything Everywhere All at Once,鈥 Baldassari says. 鈥淭hese movies are totally different from what we would have seen 20 years ago, and we鈥檙e moving away from the stereotypes.鈥

Baldassari believes her findings can be applied to other industries that have existing third-party evaluators or awards bodies. It is especially relevant for subjective work, she says, pointing to the culinary and literary sectors, which respectively have the James Beard Award and Pulitzer Prize to recognize their efforts.

As a first step, organizations should consider how their evaluation may sustain existing racial and gender inequalities, Baldassari suggests. Then, they should consider potential changes 鈥 such as diversifying evaluation bodies or adding new qualification requirements 鈥 and measure the impact.

鈥淏y changing the committees, you are opening up to more preferences and changing the standards 鈥  especially for companies that are driven by earning these awards.鈥

The Bulletin Brief logo

Subscribe to The Bulletin Brief

Rotman School of Management